top of page

8 common pitfalls of a PRD

The Product Requirements Document (PRD) is a cornerstone of effective product management. It’s the blueprint that guides design, engineering, and business teams, ensuring everyone is aligned on what needs to be built and why. But as indispensable as PRDs are, they’re also prone to missteps that can derail a project or sow confusion among teams.


Crafting an effective PRD is both an art and a science. In this blog, we’ll explore the most common pitfalls of PRDs—and how you can avoid them to ensure your document serves as a reliable North Star for your team.


1. Overloading with Detail

The Problem:

A PRD that reads like a novel can overwhelm stakeholders. Excessive detail can obscure the core objectives and make the document difficult to digest, slowing down decision-making and execution.


How to Avoid It:

Focus on the why and the what, and leave the how to the design and engineering teams. Use concise language, bullet points, and visual aids to communicate your points clearly. Remember, the PRD should be detailed enough to guide, but not so exhaustive that it paralyzes progress.


2. Vague or Ambiguous Goals

The Problem:

A PRD that lacks clear, measurable goals can lead to confusion and misalignment. Teams may interpret the document differently, resulting in divergent priorities.


How to Avoid It:

Define specific, actionable goals. Use SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) to ensure your objectives are clear and unambiguous. For example, instead of “Improve user experience,” specify, “Reduce checkout time by 20% within three months.”


3. Focusing Too Much on Features, Not Problems

The Problem:

It’s easy to fall into the trap of listing features without explaining the problem they’re solving. This can lead to feature bloat and solutions that don’t address user needs effectively.


How to Avoid It:

Start with the user problem. Clearly articulate the pain points and why solving them matters. Let the problem drive the features, not the other way around. A problem-first approach ensures the team builds meaningful, user-centric solutions.


4. Ignoring Stakeholder Input

The Problem:

A PRD created in isolation—without input from design, engineering, sales, or customer success—can lead to blind spots and resistance during execution.


How to Avoid It:

Involve stakeholders early and often. Host collaborative workshops or review sessions to gather diverse perspectives. Not only will this improve the quality of the PRD, but it will also foster buy-in and ownership across teams.


5. Failing to Keep the PRD Updated

The Problem:

A PRD that doesn’t evolve with new insights or changing priorities becomes irrelevant. Teams may end up working with outdated information, leading to misaligned efforts.


How to Avoid It:

Treat the PRD as a living document. Regularly revisit and update it as new data, feedback, or technical constraints emerge. Use version control and ensure updates are communicated clearly to all stakeholders.


6. Being Too Prescriptive

The Problem:

A PRD that dictates every detail can stifle creativity and innovation, particularly among design and engineering teams.


How to Avoid It:

Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Describe the desired result and give teams the flexibility to explore different ways to achieve it. This approach empowers your team to bring their expertise and creativity to the table.


7. Underestimating Technical Complexity

The Problem:

Overlooking technical constraints or failing to involve engineers early can result in unrealistic expectations and delays.


How to Avoid It:

Engage engineering teams from the start. Collaborate to identify potential risks and feasibility concerns before finalizing the PRD. This ensures the document reflects both ambition and reality.


8. Forgetting About Go-to-Market Teams

The Problem:

PRDs often focus exclusively on product and engineering teams, leaving out customer success, sales, and marketing. This can create a disconnect when it’s time to launch.


How to Avoid It:

Include go-to-market teams in the PRD process. Define what’s being built and why in a way that equips these teams to craft compelling messaging, onboarding strategies, and campaigns.


Final Thoughts

Creating a great PRD is no small feat, but avoiding these common pitfalls can make all the difference. By focusing on clarity, collaboration, and adaptability, you can craft a document that truly guides your team and drives product success.

Remember, a PRD isn’t just about defining requirements—it’s about empowering your teams to build solutions that matter.


What are the biggest challenges you’ve faced in writing PRDs? Share your experiences and lessons in the comments below—we’d love to learn from you!


2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page